Twitter may use Bluefin to get ad revenue

Bluefin Labs Superbowl

Twitter is starting to get serious about social TV and the ads on this media as the company has bought a social TV analytics firm after signing a contract with another company. The first company in question is the Bluefin Labs. Yes, Twitter has acquired Bluefin Labs for an undisclosed amount of money. But it is said that this acquisition is supposedly more than the TweetDeck acquisition that the micro blogging website made in 2011 for a $40 million. According to reports on Business Insider, the Twitter and Bluefin Labs acquisition can be priced anywhere between $50 million and $100 million, as the Bluefin Labs has been successful in raising $20.5 million in funding to date.

So, why did Twitter buy this company anyway? Well, it is a well-known fact that Twitter is already considered a second screen to the social TV industry as millions of users usually tweet about only TV shows, and nothing else. So it becomes a logical step for the social networking company to get closer to the actual TV industry to better its chances of making money.

It is not yet sure what Twitter is planning for its new sidekick. But since it is an analytics company, the micro blogging web site might be eyeing for some ad revenue. Fox example, Bluefin Labs says that 30.6 million comments were posted about Sunday’s Super Bowl XLVII on major social networking sites including Twitter, Facebook, and Get Glue. It also posts the top 10 TV shows of the day. When the company is capable of giving such precise information, advertising is an obvious and a profitable stream of income.

Even before acquiring Bluefin Labs, Twitter had started a social TV related venture by signing a multi-year contract with Nielsen, where the companies will “create the first social TV ratings system, which will monitor how many tweets mention a specific program or series.”

It is to see how the partnership and the acquisition will play out for Twitter, but it is a good and a brave by the company to not depend only on its micro blogging service for revenue.

Source: Apple Insider

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

BLU Announces Low-Cost Quattro Series Smartphones with NVIDIA Tegra 3 Processors

Google started off with Android with many purposes, one of them being that no one brand in the smart phone industry (and also the tablet industry) would dominate the consumer market. That is one of the main reasons that the search engine giant kept the platform open and encouraged third party developers, smart phone manufacturers, and wireless carriers to tinker, mod, or enhance the platform in any way that they consider would be good for their brands. But this customization has reached to such a level that the ‘Android’ brand is going down and one such third party brand is going up, and the brand in question is the ‘Galaxy’ brand from Samsung. Yes, reports have shown that people around the world have started using the word ‘Galaxy’ to mean ‘Android’, which is not at all good for Google. Benedict Evans, a strategy consultant for Enders Analysis, points to some charts and says: It seems that Samsung’s Galaxy brand may be overtaking Google’s Android brand in terms of consumer awareness. Even in terms of web search, Benedict Evans shows that the Galaxy brand has been rising steadily when compared to the Android brand. In fact, the search volumes for the Galaxy brand is said to have briefly eclipsed the search volumes for the Android brand for the first time in December last year. That is a great news for Samsung, obviously, but also a very bad news for Google, obviously again. So this being one of the reasons, Google decided to acquire Motorola Mobility and start off with it to bring back the Android brand back to where it belongs. And hence, we are seeing the pretty secret development of the new X-Phone at the Motorola facility which is being done in collaboration with Google engineers. We may soon see Google advertising a lot about this new smart phone which will try to bring back the Android brand.

The ‘Galaxy’ brand vs the ‘Android’ brand