,

Android powered iPhone to get a green light in Brazil

Gradiente Eletronica SA Android based iPhone

You would probably know that a consumer electronics company in Brazil is making Apple pay for nothing by taking the iPhone name first. Yes, the company in question, Gradiente Eletronica SA, had applied for the “iphone” name way back in 2000, that is too many years even before Apple announced the first ever iPhone in 2007. So the copyright regulatory agency in Brazil is letting the Brazilian consumer electronics company keep the copyrights to the name.

But what will this Gradiente Eletronica SA do with the “iphone” name? Well, you guessed it right. There is already an Android powered iPhone out in the market in Brazil, and Gradiente Eletronica SA makes these smart phones. How ironic is that? And this has to be the best irony I have ever come across.

But this is not the first time Apple is coming across something like this. We should not forget that the Cupertino tech giant faced a similar situation in China for the copyrights of the name “ipad.” What will Apple do about this then? The iOS based iPhone maker will probably try to take this decision to the court and will try to fight the Android based iPhone maker. If that does not give the required results, the Cupertino based iPhone maker will just get out its chequebook and try to buy the rights to the name in Brazil. As you can see, Apple does not own the iPhone and the iPad names in all countries in the world, not yet maybe.

But you may ask why does Apple care so much about this. That is because the analysts in the field have predicted that Brazil is going to be one of the biggest smart phone market in the near future. It is already one of the fastest growing cellular countries in the world. So obviously, the Cupertino smart phone maker wants a share of the Brazilian pie to itself.

Source: Android Authority

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Apple iWatch concepts

Apple working on curved glass display smart watch, says rumor

We all know about the legal warfare that has been going on between Apple and Samsung from over a year now. It all started when Apple alleged Samsung of copying the design of the iPhone and the iPad and employing it in the design of the company’s Galaxy family of devices, including smart phones and tablets. This happened way back in 2011. But in 2005, the two companies signed a contract which made them work together. Apple saw the potential in Samsung as an industry which invests a lot of money in research. The Jobs and Co. of that time also knew that flash memory was going to be the preferred form of mass storage, leaving devices with movable parts in the dust. And Samsung is a master in flash memory. Also, Samsung is known for its chip manufacturing. Apple saw this also as an option. So the Cupertino based company signed Samsung as its official supplier of processors for all the iPod Shuffle, iPod Nano, iPod Classic, and then the infant iPhone. But then, Samsung released its line of Galaxy devices which looked exactly like Apple’s iPhone. Jobs tried to convince Samsung to change it in the meetings that the companies held. But it did not seem promising to him. So he took the case to the public courtrooms across the globe. But as Reuters revealed for the first time ever yesterday, Tim Cook, the then Chief Operating Officer of the company and a CEO in the making, did not see eye to eye with Steve Jobs on this. Tim Cook, Jobs' successor as Apple chief executive, was opposed to suing Samsung in the first place, according to people with knowledge of the matter, largely because of that company's critical role as a supplier of components for the iPhone and the iPad. Apple bought some $8 billion worth of parts from Samsung last year, analysts estimate. What do you think would have happened if at all Tim Cook was the CEO of the time and Apple had not sued Samsung? Anyway, for more of this story, go here.

Tim Cook disagreed with Steve Jobs over suing Samsung